Chapter 32: The Life Sentence Judgment (Nov 20, 2025) - The Man Who Saw Tomorrow: Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, His Prophecies, and the Unfinished History of a Great Nation

Chapter 32: The Life Sentence Judgment (Nov 20, 2025)

Timeframe: 20 November 2025
Location: Federal High Court Abuja
Key Actors: Justice K. Omotosho, Prosecution lead David Kaswe, DSS witness PW4, IPOB observers

Epigraph:

“The court believes the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.”
— Justice Omotosho, oral ruling, 20 November 2025 [1].

The Narrative Opening

The Camera Lens

Seven television cameras lined the back wall as Justice Omotosho read a summary of the 430-page judgment. Outside, security agents ringed the court with armored trucks. Inside, IPOB supporters whispered prayers. Then came the verdict: guilty on six counts, including managing a terrorist organization. Sentence: life imprisonment. The courtroom fell silent except for the judge’s pen scratching orders to deny digital access in custody.

Section 1: The “2000 Heads” Allegation — Propaganda as evidence

Channels Television reported that the court relied heavily on PW4’s testimony alleging Kanu ordered “2,000 human heads” for ESN commander Ikonso’s burial [1]. No physical evidence was produced; no recovered remains were shown. Yet the judge held that the unchallenged testimony remained “credible and plausible.”

Section 2: The “Eating Flesh” Testimony — Sensational claims admitted

The same witness claimed ESN fighters ate human flesh for fortification. Sahara Reporters noted the absence of forensic corroboration—no DNA tests, no photographs, only oral testimony [2]. Nevertheless, the court accepted it, citing the defence’s decision not to rebut.

Section 3: The Sentence — Life, not death

Justice Omotosho ruled out the death penalty, stating he would “temper justice with mercy,” but imposed life imprisonment on counts 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6; 20 years on count 3; five years on count 7, to run concurrently. He ordered that Kanu remain in DSS “protective custody” without access to communication devices.

The “Investigative Evidence” Box

Exhibit AF: Judgment Summary Sheet (FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015)

The Verdict

The life sentence cemented the State’s narrative: IPOB was no longer an agitator but a terrorist enterprise. Yet the case rested on testimony the defence never cross-examined. Whether justice was achieved or merely performed remains contested.

Chapter Endnotes / Citations