Timeframe: June 2021 – March 2024
Location: London, Abuja, Westminster
Key Actors: UK High Commissioner Catriona Laing,
Foreign Secretaries Liz Truss & James Cleverly, MPs Caroline Lucas
& Theresa Villiers, FCDO consular teams
Epigraph:
“Will the Minister explain why a British citizen can be abducted and
tortured abroad without the United Kingdom lifting more than a
pen?”
— Caroline Lucas, House of Commons debate, 26 October 2021 [1].
The Camera Lens
Outside the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office on King Charles Street, a small crowd of diaspora activists held placards reading “Where is Britain’s outrage?” It was the week after Kenya handed Kanu to Nigerian intelligence. Journalists expected a stern démarche; instead, the FCDO issued a two-line statement acknowledging the arrest and promising consular assistance. For the activists, the muted tone sounded like complicity. London had intervened for dual nationals jailed in Tehran and Hong Kong, but when it came to a British-Nigerian broadcaster rendered in shackles, the response was a whisper.
BBC reports confirmed that British diplomats met Kanu in DSS custody in July 2021 yet publicly refused to criticize the rendition, citing the “sensitivity” of the case [2]. During an urgent question in Parliament three months later, MPs pressed Minister Amanda Milling on whether Kenya violated Article 36 of the Vienna Convention by failing to notify London. Her reply—“We have offered consular support and continue to engage”—left lawmakers disgruntled [1]. Freedom of Information disclosures reveal that IPOB’s lawyers sent dossiers on alleged torture to the High Commission; internal FCDO emails released in 2022 show officials recommending “muted handling” to preserve intelligence cooperation with Abuja [3].
Families in Britain heard little beyond template letters. Kanu’s siblings noted that consular visits occurred sporadically and that UK officials declined to observe court hearings. The perception hardened: a British passport offered louder protection when trade interests were minimal.
While appeals for diplomatic pressure languished, the Department for International Trade pressed ahead with the UK–Nigeria Economic Development Forum (EDF). In November 2021, ministers announced new energy and fintech partnerships even as Kanu’s bail motions were denied [4]. Press releases celebrated “mutual prosperity” but never mentioned the detention. Critics argued that post-Brexit economic priorities—access to Nigeria’s oil blocks, liquefied natural gas, and tech talent—outweighed the willingness to confront Abuja over human rights.
When Foreign Secretary Liz Truss toured Africa in 2022, her Abuja remarks focused on clean energy finance; she offered only a single sentence on “ongoing legal processes” when asked about Kanu. By 2024, after Justice Omotosho’s life-sentence ruling, the UK response remained calibrated: “We continue to monitor the case closely,” a spokesperson told The Guardian, declining to condemn the verdict outright.
Britain’s cautious posture underscores how citizenship can be subordinated to statecraft. By prioritizing trade forums and counterterrorism ties over transparent advocacy, London signaled to Abuja that business as usual trumped the fate of a British national. For IPOB supporters, the silence was louder than any condemnation.